
How Many
Since 2004, I have been a prisoner and for good reason. I was convicted of two counts of Aggravated Involuntary Manslaughter, for the taking of two innocent lives in a drunk driving accident. I was sentenced and remanded to a prison within the United States Department of Corrections. My earliest possible release will be not be for several years.
As on who has carried the burden of his actions, I understand all too well what I have taken. I have hurt so many people by my ignorance that early morning in the summer of early 2002. For what I have taken I am indebted, not just to the families of my victims, but to all of humanity. I cannot fix what I have done. It is beyond any man to change his past, but my future is another story.
It is for that future that I now write. Every so often I come across a news story about a fatal car crash that involved somebody like me. Every time I wonder 'could that have been the one that I prevented?'
There are so many young ignorant kids out there who are either unable or unwilling to acknowledge the fact that their actions have consequences. They are unable or unwilling to see the fact that what they do affects others as well. I believe with all of my heart that my story could help to open their eyes, but in my current state, I am unable to reach them.
There are a few things that judges, lawmakers and the general public need to know about most people who commit this type of 'crime'. This crime is not one which is motivated by malice. Buy the very wording of the charge itself...involuntary etc....one would assume that this concept was a given. Yet despite a persons lack of intention, life is still lost. Our purpose as a society should not be to punish the ignorant, but to insure that this doesn't happen in the future.
You have to understand that nobody is afraid of going to jail for a DUI. How many people are killed by drunk drivers each year, how many are convicted and thrown into prison and how much does the rate of fatal DUI accidents differ as a result of those prison sentences? You cannot train a dog by constantly beating him. Fear has never bee, is not and never will be the answer to this problem.
The answer is awareness. The answer is in the enlightening of ignorant minds by using the life experience of those who have been through an ordeal like my own. Victims and offenders need to come tighter and use their collective stories to open the eyes of a public that believes, much like I once did, that this is something that happens and to other people.
As long as people believe that they are in control of their own lives and that they are above this type of occurrence, they will never fear the law. Why fear a prison sentence for something which could not possibly happen to you? How does anyone learn the consequences if nobody is there to teach them?
I was 21 years old and I was on top of the world. Nothing could touch me. I could make it home. Why not? I'd done it so many times before. I am them! I'm your child! Don't you see? Tougher sentences are not the answer. We have to reach the hears and minds of these people by showing them how much pain one mistake can cause. Prison time has not hurt me in the ways that I thought it would. I can deal with living without for a while, but how many people can live without my story and stories like it. Just like the two victims who perished , how many innocent people will die because someone like myself never got to hear a story that could have changed their lives forever" ?
How Many?
Jeheshua
What's your "perfect world"?
LPW
It's my first distinct memory of my father: he's standing in our kitchen, making long-distance phone calls to relatives to make sure they'd done something--something he couldn't do for himself.
It was Tuesday, November 8, 1960, and I was five years old; my father was 48. And the "something" he couldn't do was to vote for John F. Kennedy. My father wasn't permitted to vote because we lived in Washington, DC.
It's understandable that a five-year-old didn't know that Washingtonians weren't able to vote. After all, most of the grownups I know now are surprised to learn that DC residents couldn't vote.
(The 23rd amendment to the US Constitution, which would grant Washingtonians the right to vote in presidential elections, would not be passed until March 29, 1961--my sixth birthday. I confess that I don't exactly remember the day, but I'm sure there was cake. Washingtonians still don't have voting members in Congress, which explains their license plate motto, "Taxation without representation!" It's also the reason that, when I'm asked if I'm from "Washington, the state," my response is, "No. Washington, the colony.")
After being assured that the extended family had, indeed, cast their votes for Kennedy, my father settled in to watch the election results on our living room TV. And I went to bed.
My second distinct memory of my father is discovering him the following morning, snoozing in front of the TV. (Richard Nixon had conceded to JFK at 3 a.m., DC time.) I remember being startled by the fact that he hadn't shaved. My father was a proper sort of gentleman; he wore a shirt and tie to work six days a week. And he shaved every day--twice. While some historians blame Richard Nixon's defeat on the appearance of dark stubble on his face during a televised debate with Kennedy, it was my father's 5 o'clock shadow that I remember best.
Every fall, my children are forced to listen to that story and endure a sermon on the incredible privilege of voting. They sigh and roll their eyes, signaling each other with that "here she goes again" look. I don't mind. The only thing that matters is that they treasure--and exercise--their right to vote.
*******
VOTE: don't think your vote, your voice won't make a difference! It does. This country was founded on the right to vote for the leadership and on issues. People have gone to war and *died * for the right to vote. This election-- and * any* election-- your voice counts.
Living In A Perfect World
What's your "perfect world"?
LPW
Here's a quote from the [Preppycrat post. ](http://preppycrat.blogspot.com/2008/10/not-stylish-not-preppy-and-definitely.html)
Courtesy of
Now I will say that Mrs. McCain PAID for this $300 thousand dollar ++ outfit from her own wallet-- but given the economy then (and considered in retrospect with the current situation) this was just bad judgement. However it was *her* money.
2) Sarah Palin has let the RNC pick up the tab. Her stylist charged the RNC over $20k for the work she did which was almost 2x the amount that amount paid the McCain's foreign policy advisor. Does anyone see the problem with the rationale here?
What's more important: the appearance or the knowledge?
Your call here -- not mine.
However I don't care HOW a president looks (overly gaunt and tall --think Lincoln; in a wheelchair-- think FDR; wearing glasses because he's really got poor vision and was a wimpy kid-- think Teddy Roosevelt) , I care about what he--or she-- can do and how much they know. I want them to be intelligent and informed. I don't care if they are all that well-dressed. Especially in hard times when people are skittish and might be living in cars.(Recently spotted a couple people living in their car in our upper class are. I know someone who has been handing out Jackson's when people ask for a buck), this is not the image the RNC needs to be putting out on the table.
Here's another image that
According to [Preppycrat;](http://preppycrat.blogspot.com/2008/10/stylish-preppy-and-quite-democratic.html)
There is a gem of an article at
Recent Comments